Coding Plan is an __AI plan comparison tool for software development__. It aggregates and regularly updates offers from major AI coding platforms — Claude Code, GLM (Z.ai), MiniMax, Kimi, and Qwen (Alibaba) — presenting for each the __starting price__, available models, __usage limits__ (number of prompts or requests per 5-hour window), and compatible development tools. The goal is to help developers, technical teams, and freelancers quickly select the plan best suited to their workflow without having to visit each vendor individually. The site is __purely editorial__: it does not resell any plans and directs directly to official publisher pages. Data is updated frequently to reflect rapid changes in pricing and limits. A __thematic FAQ__ helps users better understand the specifics of each platform.
What is Coding Plan?
Coding Plan is a comparison site dedicated to AI platform pricing plans for software development. It does not offer an AI tool itself, but aggregates and structures commercial information from major market players — prices, models, usage limits, and supported tools — in a single comparison table. The editorial team regularly updates this data to reflect a rapidly evolving market. The site is available in English and Chinese, reflecting the international and notably Asian audience of its users.
Main Features
The heart of Coding Plan is its structured comparison table. Each row corresponds to a platform (Claude Code, GLM, MiniMax, Kimi, Qwen), and each column to a key decision criterion: monthly starting price, available AI models, usage limits expressed in number of prompts or requests per 5-hour window, number of available tiers, and a differentiator for each offer. For example, GLM is highlighted for its free MCP tools, MiniMax for its generation speed (100+ tokens per second), and Claude Code as the market reference. The site complements this tabular view with a thematic FAQ answering practical questions about each platform — how to integrate GLM into Claude Code, how to access an Alibaba plan, what is the Anthropic API base for Qwen. Finally, direct links to each editor’s official pages enable transparent subscription completion.
Use Cases
Coding Plan is typically consulted during the selection phase of an AI coding plan, before subscribing. A solo developer looking to optimize their budget for AI assistance in their editor can quickly find the plan offering the most requests for the least cost. A technical team wanting to standardize their AI tool can compare usage limits per developer and available models by tier. An IT manager or CTO monitoring market offers can use the table to track price evolution. Finally, developers working with international clients — particularly in Asia — will find the coverage of Chinese platforms (GLM, MiniMax, Kimi, Qwen) particularly useful.
Advantages
The primary benefit of Coding Plan is saving time during the comparison phase. Without this tool, a developer would need to visit five different editors’ sites, read sometimes complex pricing pages, and manually note information for comparison. Coding Plan eliminates this friction by centralizing data in identical format for each platform. The site’s neutrality — no reselling, no displayed affiliate commissions, direct links to editors — strengthens trust in presented data. Availability in Chinese expands access to comparisons for Asian teams, a segment often poorly covered by Western comparison tools.
Pricing
Coding Plan is entirely free to use. There is no subscription, premium plan, or paid feature. The site positions itself as an independent editorial resource. Pricing compared on the site varies by platform: from $3/month for GLM (Z.ai) up to $20/month for Claude Code, with MiniMax and Qwen at $10/month and Kimi at approximately $7/week. These prices concern offers from third-party editors, not Coding Plan itself.
Conclusion
Coding Plan is a useful and honest monitoring resource for any developer seeking to choose their AI plan in 2026. Its strength is its simplicity: a table, updated data, official links. It does not claim to cover everything or personalize recommendations, but it effectively fulfills its role as a neutral comparison tool in a rapidly moving market. To consult before any decision to subscribe to an AI coding platform.